Chief Elder Osiris : Stephen Hawking, The Big Bang And God-Schaefer

Chief Elder Osiris

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2002
Hoteph Beloved sisters and Brothers:

Beloved, below are thoughts and comments about the cosmology of the Universe
coming from these minds you no doubt hold as being great, regarding their
thinking about the many mysteries that surround God, Universe and Beings, in
this case, Mankind.

So, what I am going to do is comment on everything that is written in the
article below, using the virginity of an Afrikan Mind of thought on the same
topics of discussion, as presented by no doubt, these minds of which you
hold to high esteem and respect, for what ever reason you do so.

The problem with the white Man, in his attempt to understand the Universe
is, he is not capable of dispelling the Human Flaw when dealing with that of
which is attempting to be understood and that is, we error in limiting
everything within the Human mental purview, in our attempt to know.

Thus he has condition us to take the same flawed approach, in all things we
question, yet our Ancient Afrikan Ancestors had no such a flaw when
conceiving of God and the Universe and the relationship, Beings are to it

So, let us get started.


This Is A Two Part Response, This Is Part One.

This require patience, it is quite lengthy.


"Time is that dimension in which cause and effect phenomena take
place. . . . If time's beginning is concurrent with the beginning of
the universe, as the space-time theorem says, then the cause of the
universe must be some entity operating in a time dimension completely
independent of and pre-existent to the time dimension of the cosmos.



I would say, Time is that Motional action which does in fact present a cause
and effect phenomena as it happen...Time action is a constant, in
relationship to all else, which is in keeping with the theorem about Space
and Time, then the cause of the Universe is of an entity, in action,
intrinsic within the same Time dimension of that we refer to as the Cosmos.


This conclusion is powerfully important to our understanding of who
God is and who or what God isn't. It tells us that the creator is
transcendent, operating beyond the dimensional limits of the
universe. It tells us that God is not the universe itself, nor is God
contained within the universe."

- Hugh Ross


This conclusion is powerfully important to our understanding of not who but
what God Is and in everything, God Is.

This tell me that the revealer is intransient, existing within all
dimension, without limits, because all things are interrelated and God is

This tell me that God is in fact the essence of the Universe and God is
freely in motion within and beyond the Universe.

Stephen Hawking, The Big Bang, and God
Henry F. Schaefer III


Dr. "Fritz" Schaefer is the Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry and
the director of the Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry at the
University of Georgia. He has been nominated for the Nobel Prize and
was recently cited as the third most quoted chemist in the

"The significance and joy in my science comes in the
occasional moments of discovering something new and saying to
myself, 'So that's how God did it!' My goal is to understand a little
corner of God's plan." --U.S. News & World Report, Dec. 23, 1991.


The significance and joy in my mind come in the moment of conceiving
something that always been and allowing my Thoughts to reveal to me, not how
or why God did anything, but to understand my reason for needing to know.

My desire is to understand all that give me a need to know of God, Universe
and Being, so that I may elevate my Soulful, Mental and Spiritual awareness
of all that I am in relationship to All That Is.

(This article is a transcript of a lecture Dr. Schaefer presented at
the University of Colorado in the spring of 1994, sponsored by
Christian Leadership and other campus ministries. Over 500 students
and professors were present.)

Stephen Hawkin's bestseller A Brief History of Time is the most
popular book about cosmology ever written.
The questions cosmology
addresses are scientifically and theologically Hawkins's Hawking's
book covers both of these implications.

Cosmology is the study of the universe as a whole--it's structure,
origin and development. I won't answer all the questions Hawking
raises concerning cosmology, but I will try to make comments on many
of them. I caution here that you should not confuse cosmology with
cosmetology, the art of beautifying the hair, skin, and nails!

Here are some of the questions cosmology seeks to answer (As
elsewhere in this lecture, I borrow heavily from astrophysicist Hugh
Ross' excellent books The Fingerprint of God and The Creator and the

*Is the universe finite or infinite in extent and content?
*Is it eternal or does it have a beginning?
*Was it created? If not, how did it get here? If so, how was this
creation accomplished and what can we learn about the agent and
events of creation?
*Who or what governs the laws and constants of physics? Are such laws
the product of chance or have they been designed? How do they relate
to the support and development of life?
*Is there any knowable existence beyond the known dimensions of the
*Is the universe running down irreversibly or will it bounce back?

Let me begin with five traditional arguments for the existence of
God. It may seem an unlikely starting point for this topic, but I
think you'll see as time goes on that these arguments keep coming up.
I'm not going to comment right away on whether these arguments are
valid or not, but I will state them because throughout astrophysical
literature these arguments are often referred to:

*The cosmological argument: the effect of the universe's existence
must have a suitable cause.
*The teleological argument: the design of the universe implies a
purpose or direction behind it.
*The rational argument: the operation of the universe, according to
order and natural law, implies a mind behind it.

The ontological argument: man's ideas of God (his God-consciousness)
implies a God who imprinted such a consciousness.
*The moral argument: man's built-in sense of right and wrong can be
accounted for only by an innate awareness of a code of law--an
awareness implanted by a higher being.



The cosmological argument:

The effect of the Universe's existence must not have a suitable cause
because, suitable to what or to whom? it is the cause and effect in and of
its action that make it suitable.

* The teleological argument:

The design of the Universe does not imply a purpose or a direction behind it
and I say only when/until Man insinuate such.

* The rational argument:

The Operation of the Universe, according to order and natural law, imply an
action of intelligence involved in it.

*The ontological argument:

Man's idea of God, must develop a God conscious, which Imply that God only
provide the ability to think and reason, but conscious is a design of Man,
based on the thoughts and ideas of Man.

*The moral argument:

There is no automatically built in sense of right or wrong, such is
constructed by the thoughts of Man.

Morality set no universal precedent, such behavior is acquired and learned
by observing the action and behavior on one another as we observe the end
result from such action.
The Big Bang

The idea that the universe had a specific time of origin has been
philosophically resisted by some very distinguished scientists.


So it is with all that we attempt to know about the Origin of God, Universe
And Being.

We could begin with Arthur Eddington, who experimentally confirmed
Einstein's general theory of relativity in 1919.


Relativity is cosmic revealing, unless there is a question of the reality of
a God action in and of the Universe.

He stated a dozen
years later: "Philosophically, the notion of a beginning to the
present order is repugnant to me and I should like to find a genuine


So it is with me, the notion of a beginning I speak of, being a repugnant
belief, there is no loop hole in Truth and reality.

He later said, "We must allow evolution an infinite amount
of time to get started."


What if I say, it is a perpetual performed action?

Albert Einstein's reaction to the consequences of his own general
theory of relativity appear to acknowledge the threat of an encounter
with God.


Well I would say more like an acknowledgement of God

Through the equations of general relativity, we can trace
the origin of the universe backward in time to some sort of a


To make such an assertion is to imply to have find the origin of God.

If everything is a continuum, in perpetual motion, then it is not possible
to locate what is not locatable.

The Universe is a contituant of god, its energy depend upon God for its
action and by that fact alone, it thrive in perpetual motion, performing
within a system of eternal infinite motion in a process of coming and going.

However, before publishing his cosmological inferences,
Einstein introduced a cosmological constant, a "fudge factor," to
yield a static model for the universe. Einstein later considered this
to be the greatest blunder of his scientific career.


Einstein, had the right idea at first and allowed his Human side to dissuade
him from the Truth, concerning the Universe and beginning, which I hold
there is none, based on the truth of Space Time continuum.

Einstein ultimately gave grudging acceptance to what he called "the
necessity for a beginning" and eventually to "the presence of a
superior reasoning power."

To imply to accept that there is a superior intelligence that is in and of
the Universe, there has to be a beginning of all material things we see, is
to verify not knowing what God is and the order Its action perform and we
attempt to place all things within the purview of our present understanding,
knowing that is subject to change, because nothing remain the same that is
of material substance. just travel a continue path of being while going to a
state of eternal existing.

But he never did accept the reality of a
personal God.

Well like Einstein, neither do I, because he was/is right, there is no
physical God, only ethereal in its existence, with intelligence, something
Man has a problem in accepting, which is why, many Time his views and
beliefs are flawed about the Universe and its action.

Why such resistance to the idea of a definite beginning of the
universe? It goes right back to that first argument, the cosmological
argument: (a) Everything that begins to exist must have a cause; (b)
If the universe began to exist, then (c) the universe must have a


Now this is a Hell of an assumption of man about the Universe, which include
all things that can be seen as well as unseen, as assumed about the
cosmological argument, such as, everything that begin to exist must have a
beginning, while there is no empirical data that can be found to
substantiate such an assumption, to some, logic point to a universal
continuous action, without having to point man two cent of limited wonder
about it, because man do not know for a fact, not even those who created

You can see the direction in which this argument is flowing--a
direction of discomfort to some physicists.


The physicist has no way to contradict the no beginning theory
scientifically and empirically, which I subscribe to.

In 1946, George Gamow, a Russian-born scientist, proposed that the
primeval fireball, the "big bang," was an intense concentration of
pure energy.

Now this belief is based on theory and not fact scientifically, and it has a
smell of religious influence or the influencing by religion.
It was the source of all the matter that now exists in
the universe. The theory predicts that all the galaxies in the
universe should be rushing away from each other at high speeds as a
result of that initial big bang. A dictionary definition of the hot
big bang theory is "the entire physical universe, all the matter and
energy and even the four dimensions of time and space, burst forth
from a state of infinite or near infinite density, temperature, and

Pure assumption, based on the level of the one setting forth such a premise,
regarding the big bang and one has to adhere to the claim that Chaos produce
order, harmony and balance, with respect among the objects, one to the
other, creating their own path of motional action, flowing from such an

I say such an explosive revelation of coming objects, following a universal
principal of coming and going and vice versus, is in fact an open ended
process, which has no beginning nor ending, such is the eternal character of
the Universe, as it show itself through such an amazing process of producing
itself, through and by its own action, of self induced energy and such a
process become the proof showing there is an essence of a God energy in
action, which affirm that God is motional energetic intelligent.

The 1965 observation of the microwave background radiation by Arno
Penzias and Robert Wilson from the Bell Telephone laboratories
convinced most scientists of the validity of the big bang theory.

Big bangs are happening everyday in the universe and such an action is not
to say it is not a perpetual action, without a beginning or ending, just a
continuation, without need to be proven or disprove, just accepted as it
reveal its action continuously throughout the Universe.
Further observations reported in 1992 have moved the big bang theory
from a consensus view to the nearly unanimous view among
cosmologists: there was an origin to the universe approximately 15
billion years ago.

I say prove such a nonfactual claim, let us admit here, we are dealing with
theories and assumption, based on the limited evidence of scientific data we
have, using man own analysis, on the strength of man belief about what he
see and do not see in and of the universe.

If God is Infinite, then the Universe is Infinite and Infinity can not be
measured, so is my thinking.

About the 1992 observations, which were from the COBE (the NASA
satellite Cosmic Background Explorer), there was a story on the front
page of virtually every newspaper in the world. The thing that the
London Times, New York Times, etc. seemed to pick up on was a
statement by George Smoot, the team leader from the Lawrence-Berkeley
Laboratory. He said, "It's like looking at God." Obviously, this
captured the public's attention.

Beloved, you see, the flaw is in the mind of the believer. To make such a
statement, " It is like looking in the face of God", is to imply that you
deem God to be something other than the Universe, if so what, or shall I
say, who?

Man Is What He /She Think!!!

A somewhat more sober assessment of the findings was given by
Frederick Burnham, a science-historian. He said, "These findings, now
available, make the idea that God created the universe a more
respectable hypothesis today than at any time in the last 100 years."


So, what empirical data does man has to make such a claim about God?

What finding, in order to present such a notion, man must be able to prove
that God is not in fact the Energy essence of the Universe, The mass of Dark
space and Time, I contend that such can not be done and all else is mere
speculation about the origin of the Universe and God, because I contend, you
can not have one without the other!!!

Not everyone was ecstatic about these observations that revealed the
so-called "big bang ripples." Certainly, those who had argued so
strongly and passionately for a steady-state model of the universe
didn't like the interpretation of these results at all--primarily two
persons, Fred Hoyle, the British astronomer, and Jeffrey Burbidge, a
very distinguished astrophysicist at the University of California at
San Diego.


And I might add, this lowly Cosmic Afrikan Thinker, in this regard, by the
name of Osiris, agree with Hoyle and Burbidge.

We can begin to get into the philosophical implications of these
observations when we assess Burbidge's statement (made during a radio
discussion with Hugh Ross) on these things. Burbidge discounts the
new experiment. He is a strong advocate still today, in the face of
overwhelming evidence, of the steady-state theory. He says these new
experiments come from "the first church of Christ of the big bang." I
can tell you that my former colleague George Smoot, at the Lawrence-
Berkeley Laboratory, took strong exception to this statement. He
absolutely insisted his observations were in no way colored by any
religious presuppositions.


The big bang theory is the brain child of religious believers, such is the
foundation upon which the Universe rest, as for its origin, it become a
matter of claim by the Church and what an influence it has in the world and
in every school of thought, concerning, God, Universe and Being, only a
virgin Thinker escape such an influence.

Burbidge does say something that is true, however. He favors the
steady-state hypothesis and claims his view supports Hinduism and not
Christianity. That is correct, because a steady-state theory of the
universe, were it to be true, would provide some support for the
endless cycles taught by Hinduism. The big bang theory is significant
evidence against Hinduism.


The steady - state hypothesis is the Ancient Teaching about God, Universe
and Being, as so conceived by our Ancient Afrikan Ancestors and there is
nothing that contemporary Man comes up with about God, Universe and Being,
that is of a higher quality of Knowledge about all we see and do not see,
that is capable of Trumping the information left by our Cosmic Ancestors to
their earthly Cosmic Carbon children, which they do not predate.

The Truth about God, Universe and Being is locked within the universality of
the body-double, which is of the higher Spiritual essence of the inquiring
Being, the Carbon Earthly Being, the Black Afrikan.

Hugh Ross, an astrophysicist, has written very persuasively on this
topic. He again brings us into the philosophical implications. Ross
says that, by definition,

Time is that dimension in which cause and effect phenomena take
place. . . . If time's beginning is concurrent with the beginning of
the universe, as the space-time theorem says, then the cause of the
universe must be some entity operating in a time dimension completely
independent of and pre-existent to the time dimension of the cosmos.

I disagree with this assumption some what, sure Time is a dimension, it is
the only dimension, in which cause and effect phenomena take place and such
a dimension is Infinite.

Religion is influencing much of this dialog.

I ask, why does Time and dimension has to be contemplated on having a
beginning and the Cause and effect is all one Time continuum of Infinite
action, separating not the source that is causing the action from the action
itself and such is my contention about Time, Dimension, Cause, Effect, God,
Universe and Being as I receive the information as given to me by my Ancient
Cosmic Carbon Ancestors, influenced not by religious belief but by the power
of energetic thought, which breed empirical knowledge, concerning the
mystery about God, Universe and being.

Sure Time and the Universe is concurrent and is intrinsic in and of its
action, thus there is no reason to speculate as to a beginning or an ending,
the two is one in its action.

This conclusion is powerfully important to our understanding of who
God is and who or what God isn't. It tells us that the creator is
transcendent, operating beyond the dimensional limits of the
universe. It tells us that God is not the universe itself, nor is God
contained within the universe.

I do not see how anyone who profess to be a scientist and is objective
toward the topics being discussed, can make such a conclusive statement as
the above so states. Again I smell religion influence all over such a false
contention about God, Universe.

There has not been any evidence presented to prove or disprove what God is
not and most certainly have not proved who God is.

I say that God is intra-dimensional, It is neither here or there, It is
where It is at all Time of action, as a matter of fact, God is the very
essence of what we call dimension.

There is no thing that God can not be nor is it any place it can not be,
because it is a God without limits or a beginning or dimension or an ending,
therefore it can be and it is the Universe and all else that take place in
the Infinite Mass Of Darkness, of which it is and does reside, in a constant
action of motional Time, in an inert state of undetected motion.

These are two very popular views, which brings us to something very
significant metaphysically or philosophically. If the big bang theory
is true, then we can conclude God is not the same as the universe (a
popular view) and God is not con-tainted within the universe (another
popular view).


The If, let me know that there is much speculation going on in regard to
this topic and to imply, therefore can say, If the big bang theory is not
true, in the way it is being projected to infer about the Universe, then I
will conclude that God is not limited and the Universe is just a phase of
that continued Infinite process in which Time and matter relate and I do say
that God and the Universe is One, in the same action being revealed.

I am always of the notion that God can not, is not, an entity to be
contained and so is the Universe and Life Being, everything is always in
perpetual motion, forever vibration, as it go through its Cosmic ritual of
going and coming, as it so reveal being inhabited in that only One Constant,
God energetic action, which change not but cause change to all it reveal by
its action.

Yes when you see the Universe you see evidence of God presence.

Stephen Hawking has said, in his writings, "the actual point of
creation lies outside the scope of presently known laws of physics,"
and a less well-known but very distinguished cosmologist, Professor
Alan Guth from MIT, says the "instant of creation remains


Such a statement by Dr. Hawkin is within the scope of rational objective
reasoning, about no known Laws, I would say because of there being no known
Laws beyond the scope of the Universe, show that there is no actual point of
such a thing as a Universe creation.

Mr Guth sum it inappropriately concerning creation, yet imply there may be a
point of creation.

I say, there is no instance whereby creation took place and such can not be
dispelled or explained to the contrary.

I want to quote from a book that I don't recommend. It is by a
brilliant physicist, Leon Lederman, a Nobel Prize winner. It is
called The God Particle and although the title sounds very appealing,
the good information is all in the first paragraph. The rest of it is
just a case for the building of the SSC, the Super Conducting-Super
Collider, which we now know is not going to be built. Therefore the
book is a bit of a Rip Van-Winkle sort of experience! But the first
paragraph is wonderful; it's a great summary of what I have said so

In the very beginning, there was a void, a curious form of vacuum, a
nothingness containing no space, no time, no matter, no light, no
sound. Yet the laws of nature were in place and this curious vacuum
held potential.

Lederman start out assuming about Time and the Universe. This is religion
talking here, there is no facts to back up this claim.

To accept Lederman claim about the beginning is to accept there is no God
and the universe act without laws to guide it and if that be the case all
else become moot, in this regard, but then he go on to assert that the laws
of nature was in place, as if there is a distinction between the Laws of
Nature and God, which I do not accept.

A story logically begins at the beginning, but this
story is about the universe and unfortunately there are no data for
the very beginnings--none, zero.


Such a statement is a carnal one. the assumption is, there is a story here
to be told about the Universe and I say why can't the fact that the Universe
is, become the revealed story in and of its appearance and action, never to
have a from and to.

The last sentence explain and says it all, from his point of view, but the
data, there is none, therefore it has always been, the universe I speak of.

End Of Part One:

It Is Time to Condemn the Lie and elevate The Truth!!!

We Must Cause Trouble ( with the truth ) Until Our Liberation!!!

It Is The Black Fool Who Say I Have Lost Nothing In Afrika!!! ( Osiris )

I Come, I Share, You Either Accept Or Reject, I Move On.

Completely Loving The Black Afrikan Nation

Honor, Respect And Praise To The Honorable Marcus Garvey

Afrikan Spiritualist, Hierophant, Political Revolutionary
National Chairman
Sankofa Repatriation Movement


Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2006
Pert em Heru!

The epistemologist' time is shortening. The book, Yurugu demonstrated this so well.

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Clyde C Coger Jr Black Christians : Stephen Hawking Was an Atheist. Here’s What He Said About God, Heaven and His Own Death Christian Study Group 12
Clyde C Coger Jr Black Sports : How Stephen Curry and the Warriors pulled off one of the NBA's great comebacks Black Sports 34
jamesfrmphilly Black People Politics : Stephen A Smith Trying To Get His Black Card Back Black People Politics 0
jamesfrmphilly Black Sports : stephen a smith calls race on eagles...... Black Sports 11
RAPTOR Black People : Stephen A Smith to Women: ‘Don’t Do Anything to Provoke’ Men Into Beating You Black People Open Forum 10
RAPTOR Egypt : Things Egyptologists wont say, Pyramids, Conspiricies. Stephen Mehler Egypt 6
RAPTOR Black People : Stephen A Smith: Lapdog for White Supremacy on the American Corporate Plantation Black People Open Forum 58
J Violaters / Violations : Un-Civility hurts Destee, from the Stephen A. Smith thread. Violators and Violations (Possible Ones) 7
skuderjaymes Black People : Stephen A. Smith puts "the black community" in it's place. Black People Open Forum 401
Kadijah Black People Politics : Stephen Colbert figures out that Hillary Clinton is Solange to the GOP's Jay Z Black People Politics 0
Kemetstry Black Entertainment : BROTHER LARRY WILMORE REPLACES STEPHEN COLBERT Black Entertainment 7
MsInterpret Black People : Stephen Wiltshire: Awesome guy can drawn by memory! Black People Open Forum 1
MsInterpret Audio Video Web Conferencing : In love with you--Erykah Badu feat. Stephen Marley Audio Video Web Conferencing 1
cherryblossom Black Positive People : San Antonio Spurs, Stephen Jackson: Academy Black People Doing Positive Things 2
RAPTOR Black People : Stephen Kinzer: America's century of regime change Black People Open Forum 0
S Jails / Prisons : Stephen Fry on American Prison Facts - British Humor Or Revelation Of Shame and Degradation In USA? Law Forum - Prisons - Gun Ownership 3
Gorilla Black Atheists : "The End of Intelligent Design?" Stephen M. Barr Atheist Study Group 2
jamesfrmphilly Podcasts / MP3s / Audio : stephen marley - mind control Audio Video Web Conferencing 20
Jahari Kavi Black People : R.I.P. to brother Stephen Tyrone Johns Black People Open Forum 31
4 Quiet Poetry Lounge : A POEM FOR STEPHEN PT. III Black Poetry - Get Your Flow On! 5
4 Quiet Poetry Lounge : "A POEM FOR STEPHEN" PT II Black Poetry - Get Your Flow On! 16
4 Quiet Poetry Lounge : “A Poem For Stephen” Black Poetry - Get Your Flow On! 7
Chief Elder Osiris Chief Elder Osiris : Stephen Hawkin, The Big Bang And God Chief Elder Osiris 0
R Black Poetry : Prevail with chemistry and like a retail shoe industrythis stuff abuzz with talks of a new ministrythat's a big boom aheadwhile you in the room li Black Poetry - Get Your Flow On! 0
Angela22 Black Sports : Big Things for the Big Easy Black Sports 0
HODEE Black Poetry : Big Time Love Black Poetry - Get Your Flow On! 0
Destee Pets / Animals : How to have a big dog in the house without the house smelling like a big dog lives in it? Pets / Animals 5
Kemetstry Black Relationships : WHY THE DIFFERENCE IS SO BIG Black Relationships 2
HODEE Black People Politics : 6 big things the new Veterans Affairs chief will have to address Black People Politics 1
Kemetstry African American History Culture : LITTLE PEOPLE DID BIG THINGS African American History Culture 1
Mario William vitale Black Poetry : Big Mac Attack Black Poetry - Get Your Flow On! 0
Clyde C Coger Jr Science and Technology : The Big Bang Wasn’t The Beginning, After All Science and Technology 1
umbrarchist Black Entertainment : Oprah on Big Screen Black Entertainment 4
Clyde C Coger Jr Nigeria : Who Likes President Trump? In Africa, Nigerians are Big Fans of the Donald Nigeria 2
jamesfrmphilly Black Positive People : BIG 3 BBall league Black People Doing Positive Things 0
jamesfrmphilly Black People : big-game-hunter-theunis-botha-crushed-to-death-by-dying-elephant Black People Open Forum 1
jamesfrmphilly Black Sports : big-baller-brand Black Sports 7
Liberty Black Money Business Jobs : The Big Reason Whites Are Richer Than Blacks in America Black Money Business Jobs 4
Queenie Black Education / Schools : The Big Lie Revealed Black Education / Schools 17
Liberty Black Entertainment : Beyonce's pregnant with TWINS! Jay-Z's wife reveals surprise baby news while putting her big bump on Black Entertainment 11
jamesfrmphilly Health and Wellness : women-with-big-butts-smarter-healthier Black Health and Wellness 1
candeesweet Black Poetry : The Big One's Won by Hook Line & Sinker Black Poetry - Get Your Flow On! 2
Liberty Black People Politics : So, this is a big deal: Black Lives Matter releases list of demands Black People Politics 2
Kemetstry Health and Wellness : BIG BUTTS EQUAL HEALTHY Black Health and Wellness 41
Clyde C Coger Jr Science and Technology : The Big Bang blows Atheism Sky High: Even Science May Eventually Catch Up to God’s Word Science and Technology 2
Clyde C Coger Jr African American History Culture : New National African-American Museum Poses Issues for Smaller Museums - Gets big Donation African American History Culture 8
Clyde C Coger Jr African American History Culture : Return to the Big Easy: New Orleans’ grassroots revival African American History Culture 0
chuck Black People Politics : Big Tree: Deep Roots! Black People Politics 0
Clyde C Coger Jr Black Money Business Jobs : Fifteen Black Entrepreneurs Make a Big Deposit In A Black-Owned Bank Black Money Business Jobs 3
Liberty Black Entertainment : Black Christmas: African-American Santa Clauses Are Making Big Bucks These Days Black Entertainment 0
Similar threads

Latest profile posts

Cheryl Fitts wrote on Destee's profile.
I am looking for participants in a study to share their experiences as former African American males served as ED/EBD/BD in the southeast. Participants ages 18-35 will be interviewed and given the opportunity to express their thoughts, feelings and impressions of their school years. If interested or for more information please contact me directly. Thanks, Cheryl
Cheryl Fitts wrote on Destee's profile.
Thank you for the welcome. I have a question. I am a doctorate student in need of participants for my study. Is it allowable to post a request for study participants. If so, this is the post that would be uploaded:
Let's us all remember in 2021 to protect our energy and to do the best we can to grow and evolve.
Queen Destee im back still showing lo e after what 20+ yrs? You know always stop through from time to time
Destee wrote on rhymebad's profile.
@rhymebad ... i love you ... :love: ... what was going wrong about polls and being blocked and stuff?