Black Money Business Jobs : READ about the Federal Reserve and our all mighty dollar.

HODEE

Alonewolf
PREMIUM MEMBER
Jul 2, 2003
5,812
854
Hodee, this is a fascinating post, with all its frightening implications. And KPITRL, your experience is very illustrative of how morally bankrupt our economic system is.
Frankly, I don't know diddly about finance, which may be why I am not financially "sound," as we like to say. Of course, I've never wanted to be wealthy. And guess what? I'm not.
Global Research based in Montreal, Canada, is one of my favored alternative news sources. In one, Ellen Brown writes how "The Global Banking Game Is Rigged." I thought I had saved another of her articles where she questions whether the private banking cartels are even Constitutional.
A separate article on Global Research asks, "Did the Federal Reserve Launder $141 Billion Dollars Through Belgium to Hide a Massive Increase in Quantitative Easing." Hell, I don't even know what quantitative easing is? But it refers to Former Reagan Assistant Treasury Secretary and Wall Street Journal Editor Paul Craig Roberts who asserts the Fed taking covert action to hide a massive dumping of US bonds.

From that Global Research report:

From November 2013 through January 2014 Belgium with a GDP of $480 billion purchased $141.2 billion of US Treasury bonds. Somehow Belgium came up with enough money to allocate during a 3-month period 29 percent of its annual GDP to the purchase of US Treasury bonds.

Certainly Belgium did not have a budget surplus of $141.2 billion. Was Belgium running a trade surplus during a 3-month period equal to 29 percent of Belgium GDP?

No, Belgium’s trade and current accounts are in deficit.

Did Belgium’s central bank print $141.2 billion worth of euros in order to make the purchase?

No, Belgium is a member of the euro system, and its central bank cannot increase the money supply.

So where did the $141.2 billion come from?

There is only one source. The money came from the US Federal Reserve, and the purchase was laundered through Belgium in order to hide the fact that actual Federal Reserve bond purchases during November 2013 through January 2014 were $112 billion per month.

In other words, during those 3 months there was a sharp rise in bond purchases by the Fed. The Fed’s actual bond purchases for those three months are $27 billion per month above the original $85 billion monthly purchase and $47 billion above the official $65 billion monthly purchase at that time.

***

Why did the Federal Reserve have to purchase so many bonds above the announced amounts and why did the Fed have to launder and hide the purchase?

Some country or countries, unknown at this time, for reasons we do not know dumped $104 billion in Treasuries in one week.
(End quote)

The implications are frighting. Interesting is this was written in 1837 and it has all of the corrupt elements and warnings contained in his speech playing out.
 
Last edited:

KPITRL

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
May 7, 2013
699
303
Hodee, this is a fascinating post, with all its frightening implications. And KPITRL, your experience is very illustrative of how morally bankrupt our economic system is.
Frankly, I don't know diddly about finance, which may be why I am not financially "sound," as we like to say. Of course, I've never wanted to be wealthy. And guess what? I'm not.
Global Research based in Montreal, Canada, is one of my favored alternative news sources. In one, Ellen Brown writes how "The Global Banking Game Is Rigged." I thought I had saved another of her articles where she questions whether the private banking cartels are even Constitutional.
A separate article on Global Research asks, "Did the Federal Reserve Launder $141 Billion Dollars Through Belgium to Hide a Massive Increase in Quantitative Easing." Hell, I don't even know what quantitative easing is? But it refers to Former Reagan Assistant Treasury Secretary and Wall Street Journal Editor Paul Craig Roberts who asserts the Fed taking covert action to hide a massive dumping of US bonds.

From that Global Research report:

From November 2013 through January 2014 Belgium with a GDP of $480 billion purchased $141.2 billion of US Treasury bonds. Somehow Belgium came up with enough money to allocate during a 3-month period 29 percent of its annual GDP to the purchase of US Treasury bonds.

Certainly Belgium did not have a budget surplus of $141.2 billion. Was Belgium running a trade surplus during a 3-month period equal to 29 percent of Belgium GDP?

No, Belgium’s trade and current accounts are in deficit.

Did Belgium’s central bank print $141.2 billion worth of euros in order to make the purchase?

No, Belgium is a member of the euro system, and its central bank cannot increase the money supply.

So where did the $141.2 billion come from?

There is only one source. The money came from the US Federal Reserve, and the purchase was laundered through Belgium in order to hide the fact that actual Federal Reserve bond purchases during November 2013 through January 2014 were $112 billion per month.

In other words, during those 3 months there was a sharp rise in bond purchases by the Fed. The Fed’s actual bond purchases for those three months are $27 billion per month above the original $85 billion monthly purchase and $47 billion above the official $65 billion monthly purchase at that time.

***

Why did the Federal Reserve have to purchase so many bonds above the announced amounts and why did the Fed have to launder and hide the purchase?

Some country or countries, unknown at this time, for reasons we do not know dumped $104 billion in Treasuries in one week.
(End quote)
It seems like the Federal Reserve is purchasing more debt than the public realizes, which was already way to much. A lot of this information you shared here gives one more reason to believe Peter Schiff isn't very far off with what he's and others been saying. not
Hodee, this is a fascinating post, with all its frightening implications. And KPITRL, your experience is very illustrative of how morally bankrupt our economic system is.
Frankly, I don't know diddly about finance, which may be why I am not financially "sound," as we like to say. Of course, I've never wanted to be wealthy. And guess what? I'm not.
Global Research based in Montreal, Canada, is one of my favored alternative news sources. In one, Ellen Brown writes how "The Global Banking Game Is Rigged." I thought I had saved another of her articles where she questions whether the private banking cartels are even Constitutional.
A separate article on Global Research asks, "Did the Federal Reserve Launder $141 Billion Dollars Through Belgium to Hide a Massive Increase in Quantitative Easing." Hell, I don't even know what quantitative easing is? But it refers to Former Reagan Assistant Treasury Secretary and Wall Street Journal Editor Paul Craig Roberts who asserts the Fed taking covert action to hide a massive dumping of US bonds.

From that Global Research report:

From November 2013 through January 2014 Belgium with a GDP of $480 billion purchased $141.2 billion of US Treasury bonds. Somehow Belgium came up with enough money to allocate during a 3-month period 29 percent of its annual GDP to the purchase of US Treasury bonds.

Certainly Belgium did not have a budget surplus of $141.2 billion. Was Belgium running a trade surplus during a 3-month period equal to 29 percent of Belgium GDP?

No, Belgium’s trade and current accounts are in deficit.

Did Belgium’s central bank print $141.2 billion worth of euros in order to make the purchase?

No, Belgium is a member of the euro system, and its central bank cannot increase the money supply.

So where did the $141.2 billion come from?

There is only one source. The money came from the US Federal Reserve, and the purchase was laundered through Belgium in order to hide the fact that actual Federal Reserve bond purchases during November 2013 through January 2014 were $112 billion per month.

In other words, during those 3 months there was a sharp rise in bond purchases by the Fed. The Fed’s actual bond purchases for those three months are $27 billion per month above the original $85 billion monthly purchase and $47 billion above the official $65 billion monthly purchase at that time.

***

Why did the Federal Reserve have to purchase so many bonds above the announced amounts and why did the Fed have to launder and hide the purchase?

Some country or countries, unknown at this time, for reasons we do not know dumped $104 billion in Treasuries in one week.
(End quote)
It seems like the Federal Reserve is purchasing more debt than they said, which was already way to much. A lot of this information you shared here gives one more reason to believe Peter Schiff and others aren't very far off with what they've been saying. But personally, I don't think Peter Schiff gave his father, Irwin Schiff, enough credit for his bravery in that you tube video I posted. His father went to prison for what he believed in. He never said he was proud of his father for standing up, but instead said he tried to warn him. Maybe he didn't say all he wanted to say in support of his father because he knew this interview would be public. That's my read on it.
 

writer33

Well-Known Member
REGISTERED MEMBER
Mar 3, 2014
208
80
HODEE and KPITRL....

When I think about it, the very idea that the private banking cartel, through the Federal Reserve, has been stealing from America, and the American people now for 101 years since passage of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act.

Only North Dakota, with the country's only state bank, seems to have proven through history that THERE IS a better way.

That the Rothchilds, and whoever else, have been richly benefiting from US borrowing from them to finance our government, and lately financing trillions for war....not only us, but other countries who finance their wars, is to me a rather astounding fact that NO ONE in 101 ********* years has ever challenged this!

I personally, and strongly, feel that the Federal Reserve Act needs to be REPEALED. Of course, Wall Street and corporate America will never relent to this. And here's a brief video about financing the "war business."


BANKS, OIL, MONEY, WAR....

This year will mark 100 years of economic slavery caused by the creation of the Federal Reserve Act back in 1913, which created the ability to manipulate the mass burden of indebtedness on us all, through government edict, taxation, Wall Street, financial shell games such as credit "ratings" bureaus, credit card debt and the high-interest "payday loan" racket. And which secretly runs and influences our political systems....

DO WE GO TO WAR for the BANKS?

Does this answer that unchecked "reason" noted here? Here's a VIDEO with terrifying implications....

All wars are bankers wars.

ALL wars.

Does that sound extreme?

Here's the evidence.

Video:

http://www.realecontv.com/page/22089.html

- Brasscheck
 

HODEE

Alonewolf
PREMIUM MEMBER
Jul 2, 2003
5,812
854
HODEE and KPITRL....

When I think about it, the very idea that the private banking cartel, through the Federal Reserve, has been stealing from America, and the American people now for 101 years since passage of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act.

Only North Dakota, with the country's only state bank, seems to have proven through history that THERE IS a better way.

That the Rothchilds, and whoever else, have been richly benefiting from US borrowing from them to finance our government, and lately financing trillions for war....not only us, but other countries who finance their wars, is to me a rather astounding fact that NO ONE in 101 ********* years has ever challenged this!

I personally, and strongly, feel that the Federal Reserve Act needs to be REPEALED. Of course, Wall Street and corporate America will never relent to this. And here's a brief video about financing the "war business."


BANKS, OIL, MONEY, WAR....

This year will mark 100 years of economic slavery caused by the creation of the Federal Reserve Act back in 1913, which created the ability to manipulate the mass burden of indebtedness on us all, through government edict, taxation, Wall Street, financial shell games such as credit "ratings" bureaus, credit card debt and the high-interest "payday loan" racket. And which secretly runs and influences our political systems....

DO WE GO TO WAR for the BANKS?

Does this answer that unchecked "reason" noted here? Here's a VIDEO with terrifying implications....

All wars are bankers wars.

ALL wars.

Does that sound extreme?

Here's the evidence.

Video:

http://www.realecontv.com/page/22089.html

- Brasscheck
Thanks for sharing. I linked the YouTube video that your link redirected.
The author and commentator of this (YOUTUBE ) video is totally Non-Democratic, and is currently focusing heavily on Clinton not being elected.

 

Fine1952

The Age of Aquarius
PREMIUM MEMBER
Sep 27, 2005
17,020
3,605
USA
Occupation
Entrepreneur

Is Trump Going to Prison?

  • yes

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.

Latest profile posts

Kemetstry wrote on Destee's profile.
still can't post polls


.
Kemetstry wrote on Destee's profile.
What ever you've done, you can no longer post to the kitchen table
Top