Metu Neter - Vols I - II - III : do we embrace white people?

StoneWall

Member
MEMBER
"the Ausarian approach to resolving family conflicts --- Embrace the God within your enemy until your enemy becomes your friend"

i'm butting heads with somebody over at afrochat who claims to be at the level of ausar and who tells me that we should embrace white people.
she says that is what the metu neter says to do.

i have a problem with that.

is there no room for warriors in khemetic society?
to respond to this I will quote Stokely Carmichael...

"Dr. King’s policy was that nonviolence would achieve the gains for black people in the United States. His major assumption was that if you are nonviolent, if you suffer, your opponent will see your suffering and will be moved to change his heart. That’s very good.... but he only made one fallacious assumption..... for, in order for non-violence to work, your opponent MUST have a conscience..."
-Stokely Carmichael
 

StoneWall

Member
MEMBER
if a white man breaks into your house at 3 in the morning do you embrace him or shoot him?

"Colonialism is not a thinking machine,
Nor a body endowed with reasoning faculties,
It is VIOLENCE in it's natural state
and it will only yield when confronted with greater violence"
-Franz Fanon
 

Djedefre

Active Member
MEMBER
"the Ausarian approach to resolving family conflicts --- Embrace the God within your enemy until your enemy becomes your friend"

i'm butting heads with somebody over at afrochat who claims to be at the level of ausar and who tells me that we should embrace white people.
she says that is what the metu neter says to do."
I am surprise this discussion got so far.
The Egyptians never applied this system to people who:
A) Did not believe in it or something similar
B) Were enemies of KMT nation or who declared war on Kmtic peoples

This rule applies to Kmtians dealing with other Kmtians and other Africans who believe in a similar system throughout the continent and beyond. For instance, the Ma'at approach works if you have a person who believes in Ubuntu and an Ausarian. Embracing your enemy might work with people coming from a society like most of the southern African kingdoms where war for the most part did not even involve people dying until Shaka Zulu had to employ it to repel Europeans. The Ausarian approach would work even between africans and aborignes, maoris or papuans and fijians. It won't work with ice peoples who want to genocide your nation and your race.

I will add, most KMT Pharaohs were trained heavily in religion. But they don't seem to be "embracing their enemies a whole lot to me" when I looked in the temple walls.







If you notice, in the above pictures, the KMTians pharaoahs with all the training in religion, you know the 40 year educatinal system, are pumping the asiatics of light skin color full of arrows, chopping their heads off with huge swords, smashing their heads in with big scepters, stripping them naked, dragging them all over the place, trampling them with their horses an then dumping their dead bodies into the river.

Do these pictures look like they are loving their enemies to you?

And even if this lady your talking to was right, should we really follow a part of a system that got a 4500 year old African kingdom usurped and taken over by a series of foreign rulers, who would enslave them, rape, them run them out their own land, and bring in wave of non-black immigrants to replace them and where original people have been genocided down from 100% of the population or 99.9% in the 2000 bc period to 10% in the 2000 ad period?

What I find funny about all this, is the bible says to love your neighbour, the golden rule, the quran says to treat people justly and the golden rule, the hindu holy scriptures have a similar golden rule, and so do the buddhist.

And you know what is really funny about this:
-white southern christians in "the bible belt" are racist as hell and hate black people for centuries,
-arabic muslims are also traditionally racist and enslaved blacks longer than white christians did and had a very long and racist slave trade and history, heck the muslims didn't even abolish slavery until Kennedy made them in the 1960s
-the hindus in India have made it clear through their racist treatment of Africans what they really think and Gandi pulled no punches on his hate of original people;
-And I don't even have to go into east asia to talk about all "buddhist" nations with the blackface and anti-blackness going on over there.

And despite all of that, there are still some black people who will look you straight in the eye and say love your enemy and still mean it, when everyone else hates us. The other races hate us because we are black, but they get away with abusing us because we lack a strict clannish behviour as a group and we don't use our money in a group manner.

And I highly doubt that Thutmosis iii and his army conquered an area covering Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Canaan, Israel, Arabia, Jordan and the Nile Valley by loving an enemy who looked nothing like him. How many hieroglyphics call the asiatics dread asiatics, vile asiatics, hated asiatics and so on?


Love your enemy is strictly for dealing with other people who believe in the system and who belong to your race. Loving a white person, or any other non-black in my view is what gets African people as a group kicked in the face repeatedly. Maybe its time for the enemy to love us.
 
Top